No Light Rail in Vancouver!

Home Grand Jury Findings Rail Supporters Europe Rail Neighborhood The Plan Cars The Bridge Publications No Tolls!
Light rail costs too much, does too little

Another Day, Another 2 Million Dollars

May 9

2008

Rail transit construction is so farking expensive that the people overseeing lose all sense of proportion. Take Denver’s FasTracks program, which is supposed to build about 119 miles of rail transit over eight years for $6.2 billion. That’s more than $2 million a day, seven days a week, 52 weeks a year.

So its not surprising that Denver’s transit agency, RTD, would casually spend $15 million on land it doesn’t need. That’s $50,000 an acre for land that is pretty similar to other land in the area that normally sells for $10,000 to $15,000 an acre.

RTD agreed to buy the land from the Union Pacific Railroad as a part of a deal in which the UP would relocate some of its facilities to get them out of the way of RTD’s new rail lines. The rest of the deal fell through — UP is not going to relocate — but RTD is still somehow stuck buying the land.

Easy come, easy go.

Meanwhile, Portland’s transit agency, Tri Met, condemned someone’s land and spent $3 million buying it and planning for a park-and-ride station on the proposed light-rail line to Milwaukie. Now it says there won’t be enough ridership on the line to justify the park-and-ride station, so it is scrapping its plans for the station.

Your first question should be, “If there won’t be enough ridership to justify a $5 million park-and-ride station, how can there be enough ridership to justify a seven-mile light-rail line costing $1.25 to $1.40 billion?” At upwards of $200 million per mile, it’s easy to see why someone wouldn’t worry about a mere $3 million.

The actual cost is likely to be even higher. The original cost estimate was based on a direct crossing of the Willamette River. Since it was made, Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) — the hospital that built the aerial tram — began lobbying for a much-more costly skewed crossing that would serve its business park a little better. Now an advisory committee has recommended this route even though there isn’t enough money available to build it.

As former Portland mayor Vera Katz says, “it’s about time we stepped up to help the city’s largest employer,” meaning OHSU. I suppose she doesn’t consider the $289 million the city is spending to subsidize OHSU’s South Waterfront campus (see “North Macadam,” p. 4) to be “help.” When you are spending one-and-a-quarter billion dollars on a light-rail line that won’t get enough ridership to justify a park-and-ride station, what’s a few more hundred million for a bridge to carry the line past a heavily subsidized high-rise business park?

14

Trackback  •  Posted in News commentary, Transportation  

Reprinted from The Antiplanner