No Light Rail in Vancouver!

Fraser Says: Dump Vancouver’s Growth-Management Plan

A new report from the Fraser Institute — Canada’s free-market think tank — says that Vancouver, BC’s growth-management plan is making Vancouver less, not more, livable. And you know the report must be right, because it was written by your very own Antiplanner.

Nice views. But how many people would really prefer to live in these high-priced condos if affordable single-family homes were available in the suburbs?

Vancouver has been practicing growth-management planning at least since 1966, when the Lower Mainland Regional Planning Board published a plan that set aside large amounts of land from development. That board was soon replaced by the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD), a backdoor effort to create a consolidated metropolitan regional government.

In the early 1970s, one of the members of the GVRD board coined the term “livable region” to cover up the fact that they were writing a plan that made the region less livable. From then on, just about every planning document prepared by the GVRD made liberal use of the term livable, making good use of the Big Lie theory: repeat a lie often enough and people will believe it.

In the early 1980s, a recession led the province’s conservative government to revoke the GVRD’s planning authority as “anti-business.” But that authority was restored by a liberal government in 1995. The new “Growth Strategies Act” required the GVRD to write a plan that would keep housing affordable, provide efficient transportation, protect the unique character of local communities, and do many other things. The GVRD ignored most of these mandates and wrote a plan that concentrated on only two things mentioned in the law: avoiding urban sprawl and minimizing the use of the automobile.

The resulting plan put more than 70 percent of the region off limits to development. It vowed to spend virtually all of the region’s transportation capital funds on a transit system that moved only about 10 percent of the region’s passenger travel (and, needless to say, none of its freight). The plan also required all communities in the region to densify and achieve a jobs-worker balance, which doesn’t do much to preserve the unique character of those communities.

As a result, the Vancouver region has the least affordable housing in Canada by far. It is tied with Toronto and Montreal in having the worst congestion in Canada. Housing affordability and congestion are only two measures of livability, but they were both explicitly mentioned in the Growth Strategies Act and both are ignored by GVRD planners who try to pretend that their plan is not responsible for Vancouver’s poor showing by these measures.

More than 70 percent of Canadians say they would prefer to live in a single-family home with a yard. Planners have deliberately worked to foil that dream. Nearly 90 percent of Vancouver’s travel is by automobile. Planners have deliberately tried to make things as difficult as possible for those travelers.

Of course, thanks to the Livable Region plan, Vancouver has lots of open space, but British Columbia hardly has a shortage of open space. British Columbia has an average population density of only 10 people per square mile; only 14 of the world’s 230 nations have lower densities than that. So Vancouver planners have managed to create an artificial land shortage in a place where land is just about the most abundant resource available.

For that, GVRD planners earn the praise of their peers, most of whom have knee-jerk reactions that open space preservation is worth any price and automobile drivers deserve the congestion they get.

Like Portland, the city of Vancouver itself is heavily populated by young singles or childless couples who love their city. But they are willing to impose their dense lifestyle on others who aren’t so thrilled about it. Perhaps the Fraser Institute can persuade some of the region’s suburban residents to turn things around.

Trackback  •  Posted in Regional planning  

3

Oct 8

2007

Reprinted from The Antiplanner