No Light Rail in Vancouver!

Home Grand Jury Findings Rail Supporters Europe Rail Neighborhood The Plan Cars The Bridge Publications No Tolls!
Light rail costs too much, does too little

Toronto Transit Going Bust

Jul 25

2007

Toronto’s transit system is facing “financial catastrophe,” and the transit agency has proposed to shut down one of the subway lines and up to 21 bus lines, plus raise fares by 10 to 25 percent. “This is one of the darkest days that we’ve seen,” said the chair of the Toronto Transit Commission.

Dark days for Toronto transit.

Flickr photo by Neuroticjose

Some people accuse Toronto’s mayor “of trying to whip up a public panic” so that the city can get more money from the province. But there are a couple of other issues involved here.

First, the Sheppard Subway line, which Toronto Transit is threatening to close, is just one more example of rail line that should never have been built. As Wikipedia notes, this was the first subway line Toronto had built in decades. It cost a billion dollars (Canadian) but was called “the subway to nowhere” and has received little use. Toronto is clearly following the planning fad of building transit in order to manipulate land uses rather than to provide cost effective transportation.

Toronto may not have enough money to run the subway, but at least people got this fine public art.

Flickr photo by Archangeli.

More broadly, faithful ally Wendell Cox thinks the real problem is the Toronto megacity. Back about a decade ago, over the protests of Jane Jacobs and, indeed, most of the region’s residents, the provincial government merged Toronto with its largest suburbs. This was supposed to save $300 million a year. Instead, the combined cities are spending $950 million more (after adjusting for inflation and population growth).

Such urban consolidations have been popular in Canada. I believe Calgary has gone through one. Vancouver remains a separate city from its suburbs, but they are all overseen by a “regional district” that the province created in order to “gently impose” consolidation when they resisted a previous consolidation measure (quoted from a 1973 article in Canadian Public Administration).

There have been a few similar consolidations in the U.S., notably when New York merged five counties into New York City in 1898. What is distinctive about the Canadian mergers is that they are often forced on the cities by the provinces, all based on the theory that bigger is better.

As Wendell points out, bigger often is better — for special interest groups that feed off of government. I suspect it is easier for such groups to persuade elected officials to hand over a few bucks when the budgets are in the billions than when they are in the millions. Most people have a vague idea of how much a million dollars is, but haven’t a clue to how much a billion is.

In 1993, former Albuquerque Mayor David Rusk wrote Cities Without Suburbs, which argued in favor of such consolidations here in the U.S. Fortunately, we can learn from the mistakes made in Canada.

Trackback  •  Posted in News commentary  

1

Reprinted from The Antiplanner