No Light Rail in Vancouver!
Endangered transit service.
Flickr photo by Ian Fuller.
Now it is planning to eliminate another 10 percent of its bus lines. It says that its goal is to increase ridership by boosting frequencies on heavily used lines and dropping routes that run nearly empty. One route to be discontinued, for example, carries an average of just six passengers per hour.
Part of the reason ridership fell after 2001 was the dot-
VTA says that its problem has been a “pledge to provide a ride to anyone, anywhere
in Santa Clara County,” no matter how few people accept that ride. This is an expensive
proposition, one that has been the downfall of many transit agencies. Its new goal
is to emphasis the high-
Unmentioned is the fact that VTA has invested huge amounts of money in rail transit
lines that mainly serve middle-
VTA has been begging the state legislature to authorize a tax increase (which would also have to be approved by voters) so it can continue building expensive rail lines that its own general manager admits it can’t afford to operate. The legislature has responded by demanding yet another audit of the agency.
A previous audit, which was done at the general manager’s behest, was severely critical of the agency yet proposed few serious reforms. Legislators would like to see the board reformed and to insure that the agency adequately considers “costs, benefits and various alternatives.”
Unfortunately, this audit is just going to waste more time and money. The problem
is clear: VTA has too much money, not a shortage. It is wildly spending that money
on projects that are way too expensive in a folorn effort to get a few people out
of their automobiles (and benefit certain property developers). Instead, it should
focus on providing cost-
Trackback • Posted in Transportation, Urban areas
San Jose’s transit agency, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA),
is cutting bus service again. Over the past six years, a series of financial crises
have forced it to cut service by almost 20 percent, contributing to a 34-
Reprinted from The Antiplanner