No Light Rail in Vancouver!
Reprinted from The Antiplanner
Let’s Talk about Gentrification
The New York Times has a love affair with Portland, but a recent article points to a dark side of Portland that the Antiplanner has commented on before: it is (as Harvard economist Edward Glaeser once put it) a “boutique city catering only to a small, highly educated elite.”
That means there isn’t much room in Portland for chronically low-
What is left “is not drug infested, but then you say, ‘Well, what happened to all
the black people that were in this area?’ ” Margaret Solomon, a long-
Portland’s solution? A “Restorative Listening Project” where white newcomers could listen to the complaints of blacks who have been pushed out and those who are left behind. The whites love it because they get to feel like they are part of some New Age reconciliation process.
Some of the blacks are not so sure. “Where’s this meeting going?” one asked the Timesarchives on the Wayback Machine (a useful source of documents no longer available on their original web sites).
Portland is not unusual. As documented by Joel Kotkin, the same thing is happening, with much greater vengeance, in the San Francisco Bay Area. It is probably also happening in Seattle. It may soon happen in Denver.
What bugs the Antiplanner is that the people in these cities, as the Times notes
in its headline, call themselves “progressives,” as if this means they care about
democracy and the rights of low-
38
Trackback • Posted in City planning, News commentary